MY VIDEOS CAN BE FOUND ON THE VIDEO PLATFORM RUMBLE
https://rumble.com/c/c-6543843
MY BLOG POSTINGS ARE ALSO PUBLISHED AT
https://nightwatchmanministries.substack.com
SPREADING GOSPEL THEN THE END
3-YEAR-OLD BOY RECEIVES WARNING FROM JESUS ABOUT THE FUTURE – YOU NEED TO KNOW!
The International Day of Peace is observed around the world each year on Sept. 21
INTERNATIONAL DAY OF ‘PEACE AND SAFETY’
Story by Chrystal Blair
This Saturday marks the International Day of Peace and the advocacy group Nonviolent Peaceforce is kicking off a series of family-friendly events in Midland.
THE FOCUS OF THE DAY IS TO ENCOURAGE NATIONS AND INDIVIDUALS TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITHOUT VIOLENCE. Nonviolent Peaceforce aims to inspire the Midland community through stage performances, the dedication of a “peace pole” and giveaways of a special book on fostering peace.
Judy Timmons, treasurer and historian of Nonviolent Peaceforce Midland, underscored the COMMITMENT TO RESOLVING CONFLICTS THROUGH DIALOGUE RATHER THAN VIOLENCE, especially in light of the MANY CONFLICTS PLAYING OUT ON THE WORLD STAGE.
“We have to listen to one another before we can bring about peace,” Timmons urged. “We have to understand where the other person is coming from. You know, I think more than ever, we need to focus our EFFORTS ON PEACE AND HOW WE CAN PROMOTE PEACE in our everyday lives.”
THE INTERNATIONAL DAY OF PEACE WAS ESTABLISHED BY THE UNITED NATIONS IN 1981, initially intended as a day of ceasefire and nonviolence.
At the UNITED NATIONS HEADQUARTERS IN NEW YORK, THE U.N. SECRETARY-GENERAL WILL RING THE PEACE BELL TO HONOR THE DAY. THIS YEAR’S THEME IS “CULTIVATING A CULTURE OF PEACE.” Timmons pointed out her group believes in teaching children the values of peaceful resolution. She noted prior to the pandemic days, they went into schools to teach anti-bullying, with a program called, “Be aware, play fair, show you care.”
“We’ve taught over 1,100 area students how to recognize what is a bully, and why are they a bully?” Timmons explained. “And how you can befriend a bully, if you will.” Timmons added the organization is working on resuming school visits. Events worldwide include educational programs, peace walks, cultural performances and advocacy campaigns.
THE WHITE HORSEMAN PRINCE BEAST ANTICHRIST MAHDI RIDES A WHITE ARABIAN STALLION FROM SAUDI ARABIA.
Revelation 13:7 And it was given unto him to make war with the [tribulation] saints, and to overcome them: and POWER WAS GIVEN HIM OVER ALL kindreds, and tongues, and NATIONS.
Daniel 8:23 And in the latter time of their kingdom, when the transgressors are come to the full, A KING OF FIERCE COUNTENANCE, AND UNDERSTANDING DARK [POLITICAL] SENTENCES, SHALL STAND UP [RISE UP ON THE WORLD’S STAGE].
24 And his power shall be mighty, BUT NOT BY HIS OWN POWER: and he shall destroy wonderfully, and SHALL PROSPER, AND PRACTISE, and shall destroy the mighty and the holy people.
25 And THROUGH HIS POLICY ALSO HE SHALL CAUSE CRAFT TO PROSPER IN HIS HAND; and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and by peace shall destroy many: he shall also stand up against the Prince of princes; but he shall be broken without hand.
26 And the VISION [2030] of the evening and the morning which was told is true: wherefore shut thou up the VISION (2030); for it shall be for many days.
FR MICHEL RODRIGUE ON 7 SEALS AND TRIBULATIONS
THE ULTIMATE GUIDE TO THE ISLAMIC ANTICHRIST
https://my.visme.co/view/vdn9746p-the-ultimate-guide-to-the-islamic-antichrist
A BIBLICAL BOTTOMLESS PIT OF EVIL: SEVEN SAUDI KINGS AND THE BEAST
SAUDI CROWN PRINCE MOHAMMED BIN SALMAN’S RISING IN GLOBAL INFLUENCE | TIMES NOW WORLD
WORLD GOVERNMENT: WEF, UN, WHO, SATAN, THE MAN-BY-SATAN (MBS) AND THE ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT
UN’S PACT FOR THE FUTURE IS ADOPTED; IT WILL SERVE THE SAME AUTHORITARIAN AND PROFITABLE AIMS AS COVID
By Rhoda Wilson on September 23, 2024 THE EXPOSE
Yesterday, attendees at the opening of the two-day of the United Nations (“UN”) Summit of the Future adopted the Pact for the Future (“Pact”) by consensus.
“Without serious and independent assessments of the outrageous covid response, and without recognition of the UN’s technical, advisory, and moral failures, any agenda forward should be assumed intended to serve the same authoritarian, and for the UN’s partners, very profitable aims,” Dr. Thi Thuy Van Dinh and Dr. David Bell write.
The Pact’s fate at the UN summit was in question until the last moment. According to ABC News, There was so much suspense that UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres had three prepared speeches, one for approval, one for rejection, and one if things weren’t clear, UN spokesman Stephane Dujarric said.
“No one is happy with this pact,” said Russia’s deputy foreign minister, Sergey Vershinin.
Seven countries voted against adopting the Pact: Russia, Nicaragua, Iran, Sudan, Belarus, North Korea and Syria. Additionally, 15 countries abstained from voting, including China, Cuba, Iraq, Laos, Malaysia, Pakistan and Sri Lanka.
Before the UN’s announcement yesterday, the Brownstone Institute published an article authored by Dr. Thi Thuy Van Dinh and Dr. David Bell. It is the fifth and final in a series of articles reviewing the plans of the UN and its agencies designing and implementing the agenda of the Summit of the Future. You can find the articles in the series by following the hyperlinks below:
Part I: The UN Smothers The Peoples With Compassion
Part II: The UN’s Green Agenda Will Spark Famine
Part III: The UN Invites Its Friends To Dinner
Part IV: Three New Pacts To Be Approved At The UN Summit
Part V: The UN Machinery Against Human Rights
In the latest article, Part V, the authors analyse the UN machinery against human rights, arguing that it has become detached from its original purpose of serving “The People” and instead prioritises its own interests and agendas. The authors highlight the UN’s plans for the Summit of the Future, which may be adopted by political leaders who have yet to face inquiries for committing crimes against humanity.
The following is a summary of Part V in Dr. Thi Thuy Van Dinh and Dr. David Bell’s series about the plans of those implementing the agenda of the Summit of the Future.
The UN’s human rights machinery, comprising Treaty Bodies, Charter-based mechanisms, and International Labour Organisation (“ILO”) supervisory bodies, is meant to promote and protect human rights. However, this machinery has become ineffective in addressing the rights of marginalised populations, the authors argued.
The numerous UN gatherings, with the help of corporate media, are beautifully scripted, staged and acted – “Only ‘We The Peoples’ are not there,” the authors said.
Once built on the premise of improving human lives, rights, and livelihoods, the system has become a cause unto itself, repeating the same empty messages and hypocritical promises over and over again, and always expanding. There are always compelling reasons to spend the money of others.
The UN Machinery against Human Rights, Dr. Thi Thuy Van Dinh and Dr. David Bell, Brownstone Institute, 22 September 2024
Dr. Van Dinh and Dr. Bell point out that despite the UN Charter’s preamble emphasising “We The Peoples,” the organisation has increasingly centralised authority, limiting individual rights.
The UN’s founding principles, as reaffirmed in the 2005 World Summit, emphasised the commitment to “actively protecting and promoting all human rights” and to mainstreaming human rights throughout the UN system. However, the current UN machinery appears to have strayed from these ideals. It has become out of touch with the people it should serve.
They highlight Article 29 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (“UDHR”), which allows for restricting freedoms for “morality, public order and the general welfare,” contrasting this with the US Bill of Rights’ protection of individual liberties to stop a tyrannical government from overriding the will of the people. “The UDHR specifically states that the UN, in its increasing determination to centralise authority within itself, can [override the will of the people],” Dr. Van Dinh and Dr. Bell said.
The two authors say that the UN has become detached from its human rights mandate, which has significant implications for the future of human rights protection. They accuse the UN machinery of ignoring the enormous harms inflicted on fundamental rights and freedoms of billions of voiceless individuals. And criticise the UN’s response to the covid-19 pandemic, particularly statements made by Secretary-General António Guterres and the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (“OHCHR”).
During the covid era, the UN failed to uphold basic human rights by endorsing restrictive measures like lockdowns and vaccine mandates without adequately considering their impact on individual freedoms.
“‘We The Peoples’ have learned a hard lesson: Our lives and rights were not the reason for the UN, but subject to it and its wealthy and powerful partners,” the two authors said.
Following Guterres’ example, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (“OHCHR”) did not defend the fundamental right to refuse vaccines, as one would assume its mandate demanded.
In a video message on 8 December 2021 addressed to the Human Rights Council, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet said that access to education and public spaces conditional on vaccination status “may be acceptable.” This contradicts principles enshrined in the UDHR and the Nuremberg Code.
Although Bachelet recognised that forced injections were not acceptable (“in no circumstances should people be forcibly administered a vaccine”), she was perfectly happy to restrict what are considered basic human rights under the UDHR, including that of education and participation in society. It was extremely strange that she did not define what was forced vaccination. Vast numbers of people on earth took the vaccines because they were threatened with losing jobs or losing the right to see family members, attend schools, reopen their businesses, or even to receive medical treatment. Surely must this amount to forced injections within any reasonable assessment of human need?
Bachelet further stated that appropriate fines could be part of the legal consequences for refuseniks. Her flawed arguments were probably based on the so-called “greater good” approach of covid-19, widely associated in the past with fascist and other totalitarian regimes.
The Nuremberg Code and UDHR of non-binding nature, however codifying the highest ethical and moral values of our societies, were developed after World War II to protect individuals at the mercy of authorities who, very often, have the monopoly of violence, control and punishment, while telling their populations to sacrifice for the community’s “greater good.”
The UN Machinery against Human Rights, Dr. Thi Thuy Van Dinh and Dr. David Bell, Brownstone Institute, 22 September 2024
The enormous harms on fundamental rights and freedoms of the voiceless billions have been fast buried, while the UN machinery continues its business as usual.
The UN’s future agenda seeks to expand its mandate and funding into areas like artificial intelligence and future generations, without acknowledging its failures during the pandemic. The UN should investigate crimes against future generations, such as national debt, poverty and lack of education.
Without serious and independent assessments of the outrageous covid response, and without recognition of the UN’s technical, advisory, and moral failures, any agenda forward should be assumed intended to serve the same authoritarian, and for the UN’s partners, very profitable aims.
[Pact for the Future, Declaration for Future Generations, and Global Digital Compact] likely will be adopted by the same political leaders who are yet to face inquiries for committing crimes against humanity on their own populations. To employ their logic, the crimes against the rights of future generations (national debts, poverty, and no education imposed) shall be also investigated.
The UN Machinery against Human Rights, Dr. Thi Thuy Van Dinh and Dr. David Bell, Brownstone Institute, 22 September 2024
The UN machinery, Dr. Van Dinh and Dr. Bell concluded, has become a self-serving system, working closely with those having the same targets. It doesn’t care if “We The Peoples” ignore its Summit, oppose or embrace it. We are not supposed to be part of the process – just its subjects as it forges a world in the image of those we once thought we had defeated.
TOTALITARIAN PLAYBOOK: UN VOTES ON ‘PACT FOR THE FUTURE,’ PUSHING TOTALITARIAN AGENDA AND THREATENING SOVEREIGNTY WITH DIGITAL CONTROLS AND RADICAL CLIMATE MANDATES
by Jim Hᴏft Sep. 22, 2024 8:40 pm THE GATEWAY PUNDIT
World leaders at the United Nations Summit have officially adopted the so-called “Pact for the Future,” a sweeping agreement that purportedly aims to address the world’s most pressing issues.
However, beneath its glossy promises lies a dangerous move towards centralized, top-down control that could have devastating consequences for individual freedoms, national sovereignty, and democratic governance.
The Pact, hailed by the UN Secretary-General as a “vision for the future,” includes initiatives like the Global Digital Compact and the Declaration on Future Generations.
But for many, this reads more like a manifesto for totalitarian governance than a collaborative effort to improve international cooperation. This grandiose Pact is being marketed as the solution to the problems of tomorrow, but critics are rightfully sounding alarms over its deeply troubling implications.
One user wrote, “This international order is irredeemably corrupt and has pernicious aspirations. What they offer is global thecnocratic totalitarianism. We must resist this with all we have within us!! Sic semper tyrannis!!”
Another wrote, “The Pact for the Future has been adopted. More UN bureaucracy, more international funds to maintain, more global summits, more climate policy and more genderism. Less sovereignty, less efficiency. Instead of focusing on peace, the UN is pushing the world into the false hope of a paradise of “global governance.”
Another commented, Pact for the future is the pact to enslave, remove borders, destroy sovereignty, give all to 1% of the world. The UN is the most dangerous org on the earth and people must demand their countries divest and dismantle the UN.”
The Global Digital Compact presents itself as a framework for digital cooperation and AI governance. But what it truly represents is an unprecedented attempt by unelected bureaucrats at the UN to gain control over the internet and the data of billions of people worldwide.
Hidden behind promises of “digital safety” and “human rights” is a commitment to centralize control of online content, allowing governments and global tech elites to dictate what is acceptable speech, effectively silencing dissent and curbing free expression.
Equally concerning are the Pact’s provisions on sustainable development and climate change, which essentially function as a Trojan horse for economic control.
The agreement calls for a reform of international financial institutions, granting more influence to developing countries. But in practice, this could lead to a redistribution of wealth and resources from prosperous nations to corrupt regimes with little regard for the rights or well-being of their citizens.
According to the press release:
“The Pact for the Future, the Global Digital Compact, and the Declaration on Future Generations open the door to new opportunities and untapped possibilities,” said the Secretary-General during his remarks at the opening of the Summit of the Future. The President of the General Assembly noted that the Pact would “lay the foundations for a sustainable, just, and peaceful global order – for all peoples and nations.”
The Pact covers a broad range of issues including peace and security, sustainable development, climate change, digital cooperation, human rights, gender, youth and future generations, and the transformation of global governance. Key deliverables in the Pact include:
IN THE AREA OF PEACE AND SECURITY
- The most progressive and concrete commitment to Security Council reform since the 1960s, with plans to improve the effectiveness and representativeness of the Council, including by redressing the historical under-representation of Africa as a priority.
- The first multilateral recommitment to nuclear disarmament in more than a decade, with a clear commitment to the goal of totally eliminating nuclear weapons.
- Agreement to strengthen international frameworks that govern outer space, including a clear commitment to prevent an arms race in outer space and the need to ensure all countries can benefit from the safe and sustainable exploration of outer space.
- Steps to avoid the weaponization and misuse of new technologies, such as lethal autonomous weapons, and affirmation that the laws of war should apply to many of these new technologies.
HUMAN RIGHTS AND GENDER
- A strengthening of our work on human rights, gender equality and the empowerment of women.
- A clear call on the need to protect human rights defenders.
- Strong signals on the importance of engagement of other stakeholders in global governance, including local and regional governments, civil society, private sector and others.
- There are provisions across the Pact and its annexes for follow-up action, to ensure that the commitments made are implemented.
ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, CLIMATE AND FINANCING FOR DEVELOPMENT
- The entire Pact is designed to turbo-charge implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals.
- The most detailed agreement ever at the United Nations on the need for reform of the international financial architecture so that it better represents and serves developing countries, including:
- Giving developing countries a greater say in how decisions are taken at international financial institutions;
- Mobilizing more financing from multilateral development banks to help developing countries meet their development needs;
- Reviewing the sovereign debt architecture to ensure that developing countries can borrow sustainably to invest in their future, with the IMF, UN, G20 and other key players working together;
- Strengthening the global financial safety net to protect the poorest in the event of financial and economic shocks, through concrete actions by the IMF and Member States;
- and accelerating measures to address the challenge of climate change, including through delivering more finance to help countries adapt to climate change and invest in renewable energy.
- Improving how we measure human progress, going beyond GDP to capturing human and planetary wellbeing and sustainability.
- A commitment to consider ways to introduce a global minimum level of taxation on high-net-worth individuals.
- On climate change, confirmation of the need to keep global temperature rise to 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and to transition away from fossil fuels in energy systems to achieve net zero emissions by 2050.
YOUTH AND FUTURE GENERATIONS
- The first ever Declaration on Future Generations, with concrete steps to take account of future generations in our decision-making, including a possible envoy for future generations.
- A commitment to more meaningful opportunities for young people to participate in the decisions that shape their lives, especially at the global level.
ON DIGITAL COOPERATION
- The Global Digital Compact, annexed to the Pact, is the first comprehensive global framework for digital cooperation and AI governance.
- At the heart of the Compact is a commitment to design, use and govern technology for the benefit of all. This includes commitments by world leaders to:
- Connect all people, schools and hospitals to the Internet;
- Anchor digital cooperation in human rights and international law;
- Make the online space safe for all, especially children, through actions by governments, tech companies and social media;
- Govern Artificial Intelligence, with a roadmap that includes an International Scientific Panel and a Global Policy Dialogue on AI;
- Make data more open and accessible, with agreements on open-source data, models, and standards;
- This is also the first global commitment to data governance, placing it on the UN agenda and requiring countries to take concrete actions by 2030.
MOHAMMED BIN SALMAN CALLS FOR UN REFORM
Caspar Webb September 23, 202422:19 ARAB NEWS
NEW YORK CITY: THE UN SYSTEM MUST BE REFORMED TO CREATE A FAIRER AND MORE EQUITABLE WORLD ORDER, Saudi Arabia’s foreign minister said on Monday.
Addressing the UN at its headquarters in New York City, Prince Faisal bin Farhan WARNED THAT INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTIONS ARE “UNFIT FOR PURPOSE,” AS DEMONSTRATED BY THE UN’S INABILITY TO HOLD ISRAEL ACCOUNTABLE FOR “ALL THE ATROCITIES IT HAS COMMITTED.”
He was speaking a day after UN member states voted to adopt the “PACT FOR THE FUTURE,” A CAMPAIGN TO BRING MULTILATERALISM “BUILD BACK BETTER FROM THE BRINK” and galvanize support for achieving the organization’s SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS.
SAUDI ARABIA “SPARED NO EFFORT” IN TAKING PART IN NEGOTIATIONS OVER THE PACT, he said, thanking attendees for their cooperation during intense debate over the outcome document.
“WE DID THIS BECAUSE WE’RE CONVINCED THAT WE NEED TO DO EVERYTHING TO BUILD A BETTER WORLD, A GREENER WORLD,” he added.
THE GREEN ENVIRONMENTAL DRAGON OF THE BEAST’S KINGDOM. MOHAMMED BIN SALMAN
“WE MUST ALSO PROMOTE MULTILATERALISM SO AS TO EFFECTIVELY CONFRONT TODAY’S CHALLENGES AND FUTURE CHALLENGES, ACHIEVING PEACE AND SECURITY FOR THE BENEFIT OF FUTURE GENERATIONS.”
THE PACT IS “ALIGNED WITH FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES,” Prince Faisal said, adding that achieving its objectives requires a “doubling of efforts to confront the various challenges and meet the needs of people all over the world.”
He added: “This pact marks;
- A QUALITATIVE STEP FORWARD IN MULTILATERAL ACTION
- IT PROMISES A FAIR AND EQUITABLE WORLD ORDER
- A WORLD ORDER WHICH PROMOTES THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SDGS
- AND MEETS THE NEEDS OF ALL STATES
“It’s a pact which calls for the closing of the digital gap, and which also promotes economic development in developing countries.”
SAUDI ARABIA HAS BEEN WORKING INTENSELY TO STRENGTHEN MULTILATERAL COOPERATION, BUT ACHIEVING A BRIGHTER FUTURE DEMANDS UN REFORM
As part of the “pressing matter,”
THE UN MUST BE RECONSTRUCTED TO SHOULDER ITS RESPONSIBILITY IN UPHOLDING INTERNATIONAL PEACE AND SECURITY.
On CLIMATE CHANGE, Saudi Arabia is “committed to a diversified approach that is context specific and tailored to the capacities of each and every country,” he said. Energy security, economic development and mitigation of the effects of CLIMATE CHANGE are the three pillars that offer a solution to the challenge, Prince Faisal added.
“We need to ensure that our commitments enshrined in the Paris Agreement and the UNFCCC (UN Framework Convention on Climate Change) are upheld,” he said.
“We’ll be welcoming the next meeting of the UN Convention to Combat Desertification. This will be the 30th anniversary meeting of parties to the convention.”
SAUDI ARABIA, WHICH IS “COMMITTED TO MEETING THE SDGS” AND THE OBJECTIVES OF THE “PACT OF THE FUTURE,” WILL “MAKE EVERY EFFORT TO BOLSTER COOPERATION”
Prince Faisal said. “We hope that our collective efforts will allow us to
UPHOLD VARIOUS VALUES SUCH AS SOVEREIGNTY, AND TO BUILD A BETTER FUTURE FOR CURRENT AND FUTURE GENERATIONS.”
THE UN JUST ADOPTED THE “PACT FOR THE FUTURE” WHICH LAYS THE FOUNDATION FOR A NEW “GLOBAL ORDER”
While everyone was distracted, the global elite got exactly what they wanted. THE UN ADOPTED THE “PACT FOR THE FUTURE” ON SEPTEMBER 22ND, AND THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA IN THE WESTERN WORLD ALMOST ENTIRELY IGNORED WHAT WAS HAPPENING. Instead, the headlines urged us to just keep focusing on Kamala Harris and Donald Trump. Sadly, THE VAST MAJORITY OF THE POPULATION HAS NEVER EVER HEARD ABOUT THE “PACT FOR THE FUTURE”, and so there was very little public debate about whether or not we should be adopting a document which LAYS THE FOUNDATION FOR A NEW “GLOBAL ORDER”. The text of the “Pact for the Future” is available online, but hardly anyone will ever read it and many of the most important provisions are buried toward the end of the 56 page document. Of course everyone should take the time to actually read this document, because OUR LEADERS JUST COMMITTED US TO AN EXTREMELY INSIDIOUS GLOBAL AGENDA THAT LITERALLY COVERS JUST ABOUT EVERY CONCEIVABLE AREA OF HUMAN ACTIVITY.
September 22nd, 2024 is a day that will go down in infamy.
Once the “Pact for the Future” was formally adopted, the following was posted on the official UN website…
World leaders today adopted a Pact for the Future that includes a Global Digital Compact and a Declaration on Future Generations. This Pact is the culmination of an inclusive, years-long process to adapt international cooperation to the realities of today and the challenges of tomorrow. THE MOST WIDE-RANGING INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENT IN MANY YEARS, COVERING ENTIRELY NEW AREAS AS WELL AS ISSUES ON WHICH AGREEMENT HAS NOT BEEN POSSIBLE IN DECADES, THE PACT AIMS ABOVE ALL TO ENSURE THAT INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTIONS CAN DELIVER IN THE FACE OF A WORLD THAT HAS CHANGED DRAMATICALLY SINCE THEY WERE CREATED. As the Secretary-General has said, “we cannot create a future fit for our grandchildren with a system built by our grandparents.”
You would think that the “most wide-ranging international agreement in many years” would make headlines all over the planet.
But that didn’t happen.
The UN press release also boldly declares that the “Pact for the Future” will “lay the foundations” for a new “global order”…
“THE PACT FOR THE FUTURE, THE GLOBAL DIGITAL COMPACT, AND THE DECLARATION ON FUTURE GENERATIONS open the door to new opportunities and untapped possibilities,” said the Secretary-General during his remarks at the opening of the Summit of the Future. The President of the General Assembly noted that the Pact would “LAY THE FOUNDATIONS FOR A SUSTAINABLE, JUST, AND PEACEFUL GLOBAL ORDER – FOR ALL PEOPLES AND NATIONS.”
The Pact covers a broad range of issues including PEACE AND SECURITY, SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, CLIMATE CHANGE, DIGITAL COOPERATION, HUMAN RIGHTS, gender, youth and future generations, AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF GLOBAL GOVERNANCE.
I don’t want to live in a new “global order” that includes “all peoples and all nations”.
I am sure that most of you feel the exact same way.
Another page on the official UN website tells us that “UN 2.0” is all about creating a “modern UN family”…
Halfway through the 2030 Agenda, the world is not on track to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. It is not too late to change course, if we all rethink, refocus, and recharge. “UN 2.0” ENCAPSULATES THE SECRETARY-GENERAL’S VISION OF A MODERN UN FAMILY, REJUVENATED BY A FORWARD-THINKING CULTURE AND EMPOWERED BY CUTTING-EDGE SKILLS FOR THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY – TO TURBOCHARGE OUR SUPPORT TO PEOPLE AND PLANET.
MBS MAKES ‘PACT’ WITH THE UNITED NATIONS:
We will strive towards this vision with a powerful fusion of innovation, data, digital, foresight and behavioural science skills and culture – a dynamic combination that we call the “Quintet of Change”. It is about evolution towards more agile, diverse, responsive, and impactful UN organizations.
That sounds so cozy, doesn’t it?
Who wouldn’t want to be a part of a “family”, right?
But the truth is that the agenda that they intend to impose on all of us will not be pleasant at all.
Over the years, much has been written about how insidious the UN’s “Sustainable Development Goals” are.
Well, the UN is openly admitting that THE “PACT FOR THE FUTURE” WAS SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED “TO TURBO-CHARGE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS”…
The most detailed agreement ever at the United Nations on THE NEED FOR REFORM OF THE INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL ARCHITECTURE so that it better represents and serves developing countries, including:
Giving developing countries a greater say in how decisions are taken at international financial institutions;
Mobilizing more financing from multilateral development banks to help developing countries meet their development needs;
REVIEWING THE SOVEREIGN DEBT ARCHITECTURE to ensure that developing countries can borrow sustainably to invest in their future, with THE IMF, UN, G20 AND OTHER KEY PLAYERS WORKING TOGETHER;
STRENGTHENING THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL SAFETY NET to protect the poorest in the event of financial and economic shocks, through concrete actions by the IMF and Member States;
and accelerating measures to ADDRESS THE CHALLENGE OF CLIMATE CHANGE, including through delivering more finance to help countries adapt to climate change and invest in renewable energy.
Improving how we measure human progress, going beyond GDP to capturing human and planetary wellbeing and sustainability.
A commitment to consider ways to introduce a global minimum level of taxation on high-net-worth individuals.
On climate change, confirmation of the need to keep global temperature rise to 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and to transition away from fossil fuels in energy systems to achieve net zero emissions by 2050.
In one way or another, ALL FORMS OF HUMAN ACTIVITY CONTRIBUTE TO “CLIMATE CHANGE”.
And so THEY INTEND TO STRICTLY REGULATE ALL FORMS OF HUMAN ACTIVITY IN ORDER TO MEET THEIR TWISTED GOALS. THE “PACT FOR THE FUTURE” ALSO RECOGNIZES A “CENTRAL ROLE” FOR THE UN AND A “COORDINATED AND MULTIDIMENSIONAL INTERNATIONAL RESPONSE” WHENEVER FUTURE “GLOBAL SHOCKS” ARISE…
We recognize the need for a more coherent, cooperative, coordinated and multidimensional international response to complex global shocks and the central role of the United Nations in this regard. Complex global shocks are events that have severely disruptive and adverse consequences for a significant proportion of countries and the global population, and that lead to impacts across multiple sectors, REQUIRING A MULTIDIMENSIONAL AND WHOLE-OF-GOVERNMENT, WHOLE-OF-SOCIETY RESPONSE.
The next time that there is a major global crisis, do you want the UN running the show and telling everyone what to do?
I tried to warn everyone about this.
I have written extensively about the “Pact for the Future”, but in the end only a very small sliver of the population got fired up about it.
Now the global elite have achieved their goal, and the opposition that they encountered was barely perceptible.
UN NATIONS ENDORSE A ‘PACT FOR THE FUTURE,’ AND THE BODY’S LEADER SAYS IT MUST BE MORE THAN TALK
Story by EDITH M. LEDERER, Associated Press
United Nations General Assembly during SUMMIT OF THE FUTURE, Sunday, Sept. 22, 2024 at U.N. headquarters.
UNITED NATIONS (AP) — The U.N. General Assembly approved a blueprint Sunday TO BRING THE WORLD’S INCREASINGLY DIVIDED NATIONS TOGETHER to tackle 21st-century challenges from CLIMATE CHANGE AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE to escalating conflicts and increasing inequality and poverty.
The 42-page “PACT FOR THE FUTURE” challenges leaders of the 193 U.N. member nations to turn promises into real actions that make a difference to the lives of the world’s more than 8 billion people.
The pact was adopted at the opening of the two-day “SUMMIT OF THE FUTURE” CALLED BY U.N. SECRETARY-GENERAL ANTONIO GUTERRES, WHO THANKED LEADERS AND DIPLOMATS FOR TAKING THE FIRST STEPS AND UNLOCKING “THE DOOR” TO A BETTER FUTURE.
“WE ARE HERE TO BRING MULTILATERALISM BACK FROM THE BRINK,” he said. “Now it is our common destiny to walk through it. That demands not just agreement, but action.”
THE TOP UN OFFICIAL DEMANDS ACTION
The U.N. chief challenged the leaders: Implement the pact. Prioritize dialogue and negotiations. End “WARS TEARING OUR WORLD APART” from the Middle East to Ukraine and Sudan. Reform the powerful U.N. Security Council. ACCELERATE REFORMS OF THE INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL SYSTEM. RAMP UP A TRANSITION FROM FOSSIL FUELS. Listen to young people and include them in decision-making.
TALK OF THE FUTURE IS DARK
THE PACT FOR THE FUTURE SAYS WORLD LEADERS ARE GATHERING “AT A TIME OF PROFOUND GLOBAL TRANSFORMATION,” and it WARNS OF “RISING CATASTROPHIC AND EXISTENTIAL RISKS” THAT COULD TIP PEOPLE EVERYWHERE “INTO A FUTURE OF PERSISTENT CRISIS AND BREAKDOWN.”
Yet, it says, leaders are coming to the U.N. at a time of hope and opportunity “to protect the needs and interests of PRESENT AND FUTURE GENERATIONS THROUGH ACTIONS IN THE PACT FOR THE FUTURE.”
The pact includes 56 actions on issues including eradicating poverty, mitigating climate change, achieving gender equality, promoting peace and protecting civilians, and reinvigorating the multilateral system to “seize the opportunities of today and tomorrow.”
Secretary-General Guterres singled out a number of key provisions in the Pact of the Future and two accompanying annexes, a GLOBAL DIGITAL COMPACT AND DECLARATION ON FUTURE GENERATIONS.
The pact commits world leaders to reform the 15-member Security Council, to make it more reflective of today’s world and “redress the historical injustice against Africa,” which has no permanent seat, and to address the under-representation of the Asia-Pacific region and Latin America.
It also “represents the first agreed multilateral support for nuclear disarmament in more than a decade,” Guterres said, and it commits “to steps to prevent an arms race in outer space and to govern the use of lethal autonomous weapons.”
THE GLOBAL DIGITAL COMPACT “INCLUDES THE FIRST TRULY UNIVERSAL AGREEMENT ON THE INTERNATIONAL GOVERNANCE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE,” THE U.N. CHIEF SAID.
The compact commits leaders to establish an INDEPENDENT INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC PANEL IN THE UNITED NATIONS TO PROMOTE SCIENTIFIC UNDERSTANDING OF AI, and its risks and opportunities. It also COMMITS THE U.N. TO INITIATE A GLOBAL DIALOGUE ON AI GOVERNANCE WITH ALL KEY PLAYERS. The pact’s actions also include measures “to mount an immediate and coordinated response TO COMPLEX SHOCKS” INCLUDING PANDEMICS, Guterres said. And it includes “a groundbreaking commitment by governments to listen to young people and include them in decision-making.
As for human rights, Guterres said, “In the face of a surge in misogyny and a rollback of women’s reproductive rights, governments have explicitly committed to removing the legal, social and economic barriers that prevent women and girls from fulfilling their potential in every sphere.”
Eighteen months of negotiations on the pact were led by Germany and Namibia. Namibian President Nangolo Mbumba said leaders must leave the SUMMIT COMMITTED TO A PATH TOWARD PEACE — NOT ONE THAT LEADS TO “AN ENVIRONMENTAL CATASTROPHE, WIDENING INEQUALITY, GLOBAL CONFLICT AND DESTRUCTION AND THE RISE OF DANGEROUS TECHNOLOGIES THAT THREATEN OUR SECURITY.”
German Chancellor Olaf Scholz warned that If countries don’t unite and implement the pact’s more than 50 actions, “not only would history judge us … but also young people around the world.”
WORLD LEADERS MEET UNDER SHADOW OF GLOBAL DIVISIONS, 3 WARS AND POSSIBLE MIDEAST CONFLICT
Issued on: 24/09/2024 – 15:03
The United Nations General Assembly has adopted a “PACT FOR THE FUTURE”, WHICH UN SECRETARY-GENERAL ANTONIO GUTERRES DESCRIBED AS A LANDMARK AGREEMENT THAT IS A “STEP-CHANGE TOWARDS MORE EFFECTIVE, INCLUSIVE, NETWORKED MULTILATERALISM”.
The pact, which also includes an annex on WORKING TOWARDS A RESPONSIBLE AND SUSTAINABLE DIGITAL FUTURE, was adopted without a vote on Sunday at the start of a two-day Summit of the Future.
The agreement came after some nine months of negotiations. “WE ARE HERE TO BRING MULTILATERALISM BACK FROM THE BRINK,” Guterres told the summit.
As an opener for the annual high-level week of the UN General Assembly, which begins on Tuesday, dozens of heads of state and government had gathered for the adoption of the pact.
LEADERS PLEDGED TO BOLSTER THE MULTILATERAL SYSTEM TO “KEEP PACE WITH A CHANGING WORLD” AND TO “PROTECT THE NEEDS AND INTERESTS OF CURRENT AND FUTURE GENERATIONS” FACING “PERSISTENT CRISIS”.
“We believe there is a PATH TO A BRIGHTER FUTURE FOR ALL OF HUMANITY,” the document of the pact said.
The UN chief has long pushed for the pact, which covers themes including PEACE AND SECURITY, GLOBAL GOVERNANCE, SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, CLIMATE CHANGE, DIGITAL COOPERATION, HUMAN RIGHTS, GENDER, YOUTH AND FUTURE GENERATIONS. It lays out some 56 broad actions that countries pledged to achieve.
UN CHIEF ANTÓNIO GUTERRES TO SEEK WORLD LEADERS’ BACKING FOR VISION OF THE FUTURE
The UN’s secretary general, António Guterres, will try to persuade world leaders to extend their horizons beyond current wars by adopting a pact that he hopes will set a path for a new system of global governance that can prevent similar crises in the future.
Global leaders will gather in New York next week for the UN Summit of the Future, the centrepiece of this year’s launch of the annual United Nations general assembly.
Guterres had outlined an ambitious agenda covering artificial intelligence, groundbreaking UN security council reform, outer space, peace operations, climate change and financing development, but critics say that outline has not so much shrunk as become ever-less specific.
The toll of grinding negotiations and the need for consensus have underlined the divisions that have immobilised the UN for a decade, leading to a watered-down document called “pact for the future” due to be announced at a summit. Talks about the final draft, its five chapters and 58 actions must end on Saturday.
For more than a year Guterres had hoped that by confronting world leaders with the scale of the future challenges they collectively face, they could be persuaded to set aside some of those divisions about the present.
Guy Ryder, the UN undersecretary for policy who is at the helm of the process, insists the pact “can render the UN and the multilateral system more effective, participatory and networked”, but at briefings he struggled to convince reporters this was not another UN mission statement that will gather dust similar to the 2015 sustainable development goals summit or the Nelson Mandela peace summit in 2018.
At a press conference Guterres called for the current generation of peacebuilders to address challenges not visible when the UN was invented as a much smaller body 80 years ago.
“International challenges are moving faster than our ability to solve them. We see out-of-control geopolitical divisions and runaway conflicts – not least in Ukraine, Gaza, Sudan and beyond. Runaway climate change. Runaway inequalities and debt. Runaway development of new technologies like artificial intelligence – without guidance or guardrails. And our institutions simply can’t keep up,” he said.
“Crises are interacting and feeding off each other – for example, as digital technologies spread climate disinformation that deepens distrust and fuels polarisation. Global institutions and frameworks are today totally inadequate to deal with these complex and even existential challenges.
“It is no great surprise. Those institutions were born in a bygone era for a bygone world.”
Few disagree with his analysis, but many question whether the pact provides new solutions, as opposed to aspirations.
Guterres insisted it represented progress, saying it offers “the strongest language on security council reform in a generation – and the most concrete step towards council enlargement since 1963. The first set of governance measures for new technologies, including artificial intelligence, in all their applications – with the UN at its centre. A major advance in reform of the international financial architecture with the most significant language yet strengthening the role of developing countries. A step change in financing the sustainable development goals and a commitment to advance our [sustainable development goals] stimulus, multiplying the resources available to developing countries.”
David Miliband, the chief executive of International Rescue Committee, said the pact did include practical proposals, such as an emergency platform allowing the UN to use its convening power to address global shocks such as pandemics. He said his test for the pact was “not novelty but strength, commitment and follow-through in a world where the nature of global risk has changed”.
But the negotiators have confronted familiar problems including cold war standoffs, shortage of cash and entrenched western reluctance to cede power to emerging powers – at the security council and in financial institutions. Seeking consensus among 193 countries has been no easy task for the two facilitators, Germany and Namibia. Nor has the backdrop of wars in Ukraine, Gaza and Sudan helped the atmosphere.
Various critics have said the UN pact is not the right place to settle specific differences. Russia has opposed overspecific references to nuclear disarmament. Others have said the Cop conferences are the only place to address the climate crisis.
Richard Gowan, the UN specialist at the International Crisis Group, said there was a western reluctance to address the imbalances in the multilateral financial bodies. In a paper for Chatham House thinktank he observed: “The US and its allies argue that the UN is not the right space to negotiate complex financial issues. They say the World Bank and [International Monetary Fund] – where western powers still hold decisive shares of the votes – have a mandate to address these topics. A lot of diplomats from poorer states will be happy if world leaders make political commitments to sort out debt and development issues at the summit. But some hardliners, such as Pakistan, have argued that is not enough, and have even suggested cancelling the summit.”
There are some signs of movement on security council reform where three of the five permanent members on the 15-strong council are France, the UK and the US. The US has suggested creating two new permanent seats for African countries without veto power. But India and Brazil’s claims are also pressing. On the theme of expansion of the security council, an answer may eventually be found.
Ingenious solutions to reduce the veto of the permanent members abound, only to be crushed on the rock of objections from Russia, US and China, and a slow migration is visible to greater use of the larger general assembly where the veto does not apply. But the speed of reform does not match the speed with which the world – its technology and power dynamics – is changing.
At best Gowan argues the pact can provide a hook or staging post for UN reform, and for new issues such as AI to proceed at future summits.
Miliband said the UN system could only be as good as its members. He said: “Fragmentation of political power around the world is producing gridlock at the apex of the international system: the UN security council.”
WHAT THE UN SEES IN AI
September 24, 2024 Scott Nover
In a United Nations event called the Summit of the Future over the weekend, a panel of experts discussed their newly released report on ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE GOVERNANCE, TITLED “GOVERNING AI FOR HUMANITY.” The panel, chaired by Eurasia Group and GZERO Media founder and President Ian Bremmer, included Carme Artigas, former Spanish secretary of state for digitalization and AI; Vilas Dhar of the Patrick J. McGovern Foundation; Jian Wang, Alibaba’s CTO; Volker Türk, the UN high commissioner for human rights; Alondra Nelson from the Institute for Advanced Study; and James Manyika, senior vice president of research, technology, and society at Google.
BREMMER SAID THAT ONE OF HIS EARLIEST CONVERSATIONS WITH ANTÓNIO GUTERRES, THE UN SECRETARY-GENERAL, TOLD HIM THAT HIS TWO BIGGEST PRIORITIES WERE STOPPING THE CHARGE OF CLIMATE CHANGE AND DEALING WITH THE CONSEQUENCES AND OPPORTUNITIES OF DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGY. (Watch Bremmer’s recent interview with Guterres about AI here.)
THE BEAST’S SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY: ARTIFICAL INTELLIGENCE, GENETIC ENGINEERING, TRANSUMANISM, ROBOTICS, INTERNET OF THINGS. THE FOURTH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION.
Due to its complex nature and ever-changing technology, Türk said it was a “minor miracle” that the report was completed. He cautioned that the biggest challenge with AI GOVERNANCE IS LOSS OF CONTROL, NOTING “ONCE THE GENIE IS OUT OF THE BODY, HOW DO YOU CONTROL THE GENIE?”
The panel discussed its recommendations in the report, which include a global fund for AI, an AI office within the secretariat, and an international scientific panel on AI. Artigas noted that the group stopped short of recommending a brand-new UN agency on artificial intelligence and felt they had the existing frameworks to accomplish their goals.
Google’s Manyika stressed the importance of building trust in AI. “If this technology’s going to have the impact that we think it’s gonna have, THE PUBLIC HAS TO TRUST IT, the public has to feel that we and everybody else that’s developing, deploying, and using it is held accountable,” he said. “We have a profound responsibility.”
The group looked ahead to THE GLOBAL DIGITAL COMPACT AND THE PACT OF THE FUTURE, UN PROPOSALS ADOPTED AT THE SUMMIT OF THE FUTURE, which call for ENHANCED INTERNATIONAL GOVERNANCE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN WAYS THAT ARE “HUMAN-CENTRIC,” RESPECT HUMAN RIGHTS, AND ADVANCE THE UN’S SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS, OR SDGS.
During the panel conversation, Manyika also cited research from the International Telecommunication Union that found that MOST OF THE SDGS COULD BE ACHIEVED WITH HELP FROM AI. Bremmer and Co. said that the focus of AI governance shouldn’t just be how to rein in the technology – though that’s a huge part – but also how to use the technology to help society move forward.
UN CALLS FOR LAYING FOUNDATIONS OF GLOBAL GOVERNANCE FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Story by Kateryna Serohina
THE UN ADVISORY BODY STATED THAT GLOBAL GOVERNANCE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IS ESSENTIAL. IT URGED THE UNITED NATIONS TO LAY THE GROUNDWORK FOR THE FIRST INCLUSIVE GLOBAL INSTITUTIONS TO REGULATE RAPIDLY EVOLVING TECHNOLOGIES, reports AP.
In a 100-page report, the group stated that artificial intelligence is transforming our world, offering immense potential for good, from discovering new fields of science and accelerating economic growth to improving healthcare, and agriculture, and optimizing energy networks.
However, IT WARNED THAT WITHOUT PROPER CONTROL, THE BENEFITS OF AI COULD BE CONFINED TO A SMALL NUMBER OF COUNTRIES, COMPANIES, AND INDIVIDUALS, WHILE EVEN MORE POWERFUL SYSTEMS THAN THOSE CURRENTLY IN EXISTENCE COULD UPEND THE WORLD OF WORK, CREATE AUTONOMOUS WEAPONS, AND POSE RISKS TO PEACE AND SECURITY.
The advisory body OUTLINED PRINCIPLES FOR ESTABLISHING NEW INSTITUTIONS TO GOVERN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, EMPHASIZING THE IMPORTANCE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, PARTICULARLY HUMAN RIGHTS. It calls on all governments and stakeholders INVOLVED IN AI TO COLLABORATE TO PROTECT HUMAN RIGHTS.
Currently, the report notes, that only SEVEN out of 193 UN MEMBER COUNTRIES ARE PARTICIPATING IN SEVEN RECENT INITIATIVES regarding AI governance, while 118 countries, primarily from the Global South, are absent from any discussions.
On September 5, THE FIRST LEGALLY BINDING INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENT ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE WAS OPENED FOR SIGNATURE, INVOLVING COUNTRIES INCLUDING MEMBERS OF THE EU, THE US, AND THE UK.
*******
Matthew 28:19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of THE FATHER, AND OF THE SON, AND OF THE HOLY GHOST:
And I saw heaven opened, and BEHOLD A WHITE HORSE; AND HE THAT SAT UPON HIM WAS CALLED FAITHFUL AND TRUE, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war.
And the armies which were in heaven FOLLOWED HIM UPON WHITE HORSES, CLOTHED IN FINE LINEN, WHITE AND CLEAN.
Psalm 2:12: “Kiss the Son, lest He be angry, and you perish in the way, when His wrath is kindled but a little. Blessed are all those who put their trust in Him.” John 3:36: “He who believes in the Son has everlasting life; and he who does not believe the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God abides on him.”
The formula is simple: if you reject the Son, you will receive the wrath.
Ye are my witnesses, saith the Lord, and my servant whom I have chosen: that ye may know and believe me, and UNDERSTAND THAT I AM HE: before me there was no God formed, neither shall there be after me.
Isaiah 52:6 Therefore my people shall know my name: therefore THEY SHALL KNOW IN THAT DAY THAT I AM HE THAT DOTH SPEAK: BEHOLD, IT IS I.
Luke 21:28 And WHEN THESE THINGS BEGIN TO COME TO PASS, THEN LOOK UP, AND LIFT UP YOUR HEADS; FOR YOUR REDEMPTION DRAWETH NIGH.
*******
In His Service,
Night Watchman
Paul Rolland
Night Watchman Ministries
Make Your (7) Decision for Christ NOW!!!!!!! Time is Up!!!!!!!
Jesus Christ’s Offer of Salvation:
The ABCs (7) of Salvation through Jesus Christ (the Lamb)
- (7) Admit/Acknowledge/Accept that you are sinner. Ask (7) God’s forgiveness and repent of your sins.
. . . “For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God.” (Romans 3:23).
. . . “As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one.” (Romans 3:10).
. . . “If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.” (1 John 1:8).
B. Believe Jesus is Lord. Believe that (7) Jesus Christ is who He claimed to (7) be; that He was both fully God (7) and fully man and that we are (7) saved through His death, burial, and resurrection. (7) Put your trust in Him as your (7) only hope of salvation. Become a son (7) or daughter of God by receiving Christ. (7777777) 7×7
. . . “That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life. For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God sent not his son into the world to condemn the world; but have everlasting life. For God sent not his son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. (John 3:15-17). For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.” (Romans 10:13).
C. Call upon His name, Confess (7) with your heart and with your lips (7) that Jesus is your Lord and Savior.
. . . “That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.” (Romans 10:9-10).
TAGS: 666, Prince, Beast, Antichrist, One World Government Leader, 8th King of Saudi Arabia, the Assyrian, the Man of Lawlessness, the Son of Perdition, the Desolator, Mahdi, 12th Imam, Muslim ‘Savior’, Christian ‘Antichrist’, White Horseman, False Peace, False Security, Lies, King of Dark Political Sentences and Promises, Deception, Delusion, Denial, Defiance, Derangement, Destruction, Tribulation, Day of the Lord, Great Tribulation, Muslim, Islam, House of Saud, Confirmer of the False Seven Peace Covenant, the Little Horn, the Big Beast, Man by Satan (MbS), Mohammed bin Salman, the Wicked One, False 7 Year Peace Covenant, Vision 2030
TAGS: One World Currency, One World Government, BRICS, Digital Currency, Government Controlled Economy, No Buy Or Sell W/O Mark, One World Government Leader, Prince, Beast, Antichrist, Man by Satan (MbS), Mohammed bin Salman, United Nations, UN, World Economic Forum, WEF, Klaus Schwab, International Digital Payment System, Destruction of the Petro Dollar, Financial Crash, Depression, Government Intercession, Global Money Network, Central Banks, CBDC’s, Central Bank Digital Currencies, Digital Identity, Digital Verification, Digital Control, Vision 2030
TAGS: Fourth Industrial Revolution, World Economic Forum, Saudi Arabia, Klaus Schwab, Mohammed bin Salman, Man by Satan (MbS), Artificial Intelligence, Transhumanism, Genetic Editing, Chip Brain Implants, Robotics, Nanotechnology, Singularity, Microneedle Patch Vaccinations, Advanced Technology, fourth kingdom, mark of the beast, infrared microneedle vaccination qr code smart patch mark, new technologies, 5g network, 6g network, internet of things, IOT, surveillance, biometric scanning, biometrics, bio-engineering, CRISPR, Nephilim, under the skin surveillance, Vision 2030,
TAGS: Green Dragon, Eco-Theology, Environmentalism, Environmental Religion, Earth Worship, Net Zero, Sustainability, Doctrines of Devils, Deception, Lies, Falsehood, Worship of the Creation, Latter Days, End Times, Tribulation, Climate Change, Climate Destruction, Natural Disasters, Floods, Great Heat, Drought, Famines, Wildfires, Coastline Erosion, Pollution, Vision 2030
TAGS: Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, White Horseman, Red Horseman, Black Horseman, Pale Horseman, False Peace, False Security, Antichrist, War, Conflict, Destruction, Economic Collapse, Inflation, Economic Scales, Wheat for a Day’s Wages, Scarcity, Famine, Starvation, Pestilence, Disease, Death, Plagues, Hell, End Times, Tribulation, Seven Seals of the Tribulation, First Four Seals, Start of the Seven Year Tribulation, Day of the Lord, Vision 2030
TAGS: summit of the future, pact for the future, planetary emergency, individual sovereignty, national sovereignty, sustainable digital societies, multilataralism, sdg achievement, common agenda, leave no one behind, peace and security, peace and prosperity, financial inclusivity, new global consensus, renewal of trust and solidarity, renewal of the multilateral system, defining moment, 2030 agenda, vision 2030, sustainability, the un charter, once-in-a-generation opportunity, global governance, multilateral governance, updated un, un 2.0, reset, great reset, global financial system, international financial architecture, climate action, net zero goals, build a new contract, global north, global south, international monetary fund (imf), world bank, new bretton woods moment, bill and melinda gates foundation, rules for governing monetary relations, action-oriented outcome document, sustainable financing, a vision of a multilateral system, reinvigorating the multilateral system, emergency platform, planetary emergency, climate-emergency declaration, un secretary general antonio guterres, tipping points, triple planetary emergency, charting a safe path for a workable future, planetary boundary governance, global governance forum, climate governance commission, rockefeller foundation, expanding concepts of global governance, collective wisdom, political courage, existential planetary risks, climate alarmism, doomsday predictions, tribulation, one world government, system of the beast, seven years to change course, governing our planetary emergency, un climate change conference cop28, new perspectives on global governance, enhance intergovernmental negotiations, global collective action innovations, planetary emergency paradigm, near-term international governance innovations, global stability and security, individual responsibility for environmental crimes, ecocide as a crime under the international criminal court, next generation working proposals, international court for the environment, global sustainability issues, planetary boundaries framework for human development, world economic forum, nine planetary boundaries, maximum human-induced disruption, future governance models, planetary commons, align global law and governance, science of the earth system, the global goal of a sustainable earth, collective global-scale solutions, transcend national boundaries, the club of rome, polycrisis, club of rome planetary emergency project, planetary emergency plan, greenhouse gas emissions, eugenics, faux environmental agenda, clean purging of the global population to sustainable levels, anti-human ideology, population control, limiting human movement, who pandemic agreement, financing pact of the future, plans for world government,
Categories: 'Last' 'Latter' 'End of' Days, Anti-Christ, Antichrist, Antichrist, Beast, Birds of a Feather, Christian Persecution Update, Demonic Locusts, Distress of Nations, Doctrines of Devils, Evil Prince Confirmer of False Peace, False Idols, Fig Tree Generation, FIRST Horseman Apocalypse, Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, Government Repression Control, Great Angel of Prophecy, GREAT WARNING!!!, Last Nimrod, Mahdi, Man by Satan, Man of Lawlessness, MbS Beast Prince Antichrist, Peace, Safety, Sudden Destruction, Perilous Times, Prophetic Timelines, Rumors and Threats of Wars, Second Coming of Christ, Seven (7) Seals, Sheep & Goat Nation Judgement, Six (6) Six (6) Six (6) - 666, Son of Perdition, The Assyrian, The Final Generation, Third Temple, Those Left Behind, Update of Lawlessness and Violence, VISION 2030