Vaccination Mark of the Beast System:
(Five (5); Digital ID, Vaccination Passport, Biometric Scanning, ‘Mark’ or ‘code/number’ of Approval or Authorization, 5G Technology/Network.)
The ‘coming’ mark will most likely involve a ‘subdermal’ application of the next wave of vaccinations, that will include a form of ‘digital data memory’ indicating date and time of vaccination. This ‘mark’ of vaccination will involve a sub-dermal outline or image representing a ‘branding’ that can be scanned and revealed by ultra-violet light at a retail checkout point scanner. Just as many people have a physical vaccination ‘mark’ on their arm from getting shots in the 1960s, the coming vaccination mark will be subtle and reside ‘inside’ the human body affecting and indicating a genomic change in the recipient. This is an abomination viewed by God and causes the recipient to lose ‘Imager Status Before God’ and results in eternal damnation. The vaccination ‘mark’ has to be easily accessible by scanners and retail checkout points, hence the recipient will have the option of receiving the vaccination ‘patch’ either on their hand or forehead for ‘scannability.’ The patch or medium itself ‘dissolves’ on the exterior of the skin, as the vaccination and information is administered or delivered under the skin. Some technology is currently under development that will possibly allow for the recipient’s health status and response to the vaccine to be ‘scanned’ and ‘verified’ or ‘validated’ at retail or social checkpoints. The purpose of which is to identify whether or not the vaccine has actually worked (and is working) on the recipient’s body / immune system / genetics / RNA / DNA, in addition to informing authorities as to date, time, dosage and manufacturer of said ‘medicine.’
Revelation 13:16-17 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone.
And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name.
And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had NOT worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.
5G + Biometric Facial / Hand Scanning + Digital / Cashless Transactions + Mark of Approval / Authorization = Tomorrow’s Economy (2020-2027). Why 2020? Because these ‘things’ have already occurred (past tense) elsewhere (China, India, Asia and a few countries in Europe) in the world in 2020, even though they have not yet occurred in the ‘United’ States.
Biometric scanning used for migrant/border control, secure identity verification and approval, government benefits, domestic and international travel security, economic inclusion of everyone, buying/selling transactions and fund transfers, instantaneous speed of transaction and convenience, VAT/taxation collection, mobility, social credit score and ranking, population movement and tracking, monitoring political and religious ‘extremism’ (terrorists). ‘Mark, number or name’ for verification and approval.
‘Any foreign material(s) should NOT be injected into the human body that causes any kind of change in genetic makeup or structure of a human being. This could be five (5) genetic ‘manipulation’, ‘enhancement’, ‘cutting’, ‘modification’, or ‘alteration.’
And the first went, and poured out his vial upon the earth; and there fell a noisome and grievous sore upon the men which had the mark of the beast, and upon them which worshipped his image. [Symptom or result from having ‘received’ the mark, a result from having changed or damaged a person’s RNA, DNA, Immune System or Genetics?].
Both American vaccines use messenger RNA (mRNA) to combat the virus. That is an advanced genetic therapy that uses the virus’ own genetic material against it. Kendrick, however, warns that the technology isreally new and untested, meaning no one really knows how it could affect human health, since it literally hijacks the cellular reproduction mechanism. “We really do not know what these things might end up doing after a prolonged period of time.”
“The plague year of 2020 will be remembered as the time when these traditional vaccines were supplanted by something fundamentally new: genetic vaccines, which deliver a gene or piece of genetic code into human cells. The genetic instructions then cause the cells to produce, on their own, safe components of the target virus in order to stimulate the patient’s immune system.”
‘The MARK’ may not be here just yet, but it will be shortly … in terms of either months or a year or two. Verification that a ‘genetic manipulation’ has been administered and will be evident, either on the hand or forehead by biometric scanning to enable travel, buying and selling. Do you still ‘want to take’ the jab even if it is not yet administered on your hand or forehead in some other manner? If you are curious, please read my other analyses on ‘why’ getting ‘the mark’ is such a bad (understatement) thing in the eyes of God. It is one thing to understand that people in the extremely near future should NOT GET THE MARK. It is another thing to UNDERSTAND WHY THEY SHOULD NOT GET A MARK. This is not a ‘conspiracy theory,’ but the Word of God. I have provided the requisite verses from the Bible, regarding God’s comments about ‘the mark’ of the coming world beast system.
NO ‘MICROCHIP’ NEEDED. Implantable Quantum Dot Microneedle Vaccine Delivery System: A Quick Overview.
MIT researchers have now developed a novel way to record a patient’s vaccination history: storing the data in a pattern of dye, invisible to the naked eye, that is delivered under the skin at the same time as the vaccine. This technology could enable the rapid and anonymous detection of patient vaccination history. The researchers showed that their new dye, which consists of nanocrystals called quantum dots, can remain for at least five (5) years under the skin, where it emits near-infrared light that can be detected by a specially equipped smartphone. To create an “on-patient,” decentralized medical record, the researchers developed a new type of copper-based quantum dots, which emit light in the near-infrared spectrum. The dots are only about 4 nanometers in diameter, but they are encapsulated in biocompatible microparticles that form spheres about 20 microns in diameter. This encapsulation allows the dye to remain in place, under the skin, after being injected. The researchers designed their dye to be delivered by a microneedle ‘patch’ rather than a traditional syringe and needle. Such patches are now being developed to deliver vaccines for measles, rubella, and other diseases, and the researchers showed that their dye could be easily incorporated into these patches. The microneedles used in this study are made from a mixture of dissolvable sugar and a polymer called PVA, as well as the quantum-dot dye and the vaccine. When the patch is applied to the skin, the microneedles, which are 1.5 millimeters long, partially dissolve, releasing their payload within about two minutes.
By selectively loading microparticles into microneedles, the patches deliver a pattern in the skin that is invisible to the naked eye but can be scanned with a smartphone that has the infrared filter removed. The patch can be customized to imprint different patterns that correspond to the type of vaccine delivered. “It’s possible that this ‘invisible’ approach could create new possibilities for data storage, biosensing, and vaccine applications that could improve how medical care is provided, particularly in the developing world,” Langer says.
The quantum-dot patterns could be detected by smartphone cameras after up to five (5) years of simulated sun exposure. The researchers are also working on expanding the amount of data that can be encoded in a single pattern, allowing them to include information such as the date of vaccine administration and the lot number of the vaccine batch. “Storage, access, and control of medical records is an important topic with many possible approaches.” “This study presents a novel approach where the medical record is stored and controlled by the patient within the patient’s skin in a minimally invasive and elegant way.” The research was funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Koch Institute Support (core) Grant from the National Cancer Institute.
Alarming conflicts of interest, other big red flags taint COVID vaccine approval process
Can a COVID-19 vaccine approval process marked by such egregious and numerous conflicts of interest refrain from compromising public health and safety?
Wed Mar 17, 2021 – 7:58 am EST LIFESITENEWS
March 17, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — In the controversy surrounding the COVID-19 virus and vaccines — as with any controversy — the data you present to someone with an opposing opinion will, more often than not, have little effect on their opinion. There’s a good chance you know someone who has looked at the same reports, scientific commentary, and death counts that you have, but has reached completely different conclusions about the danger of the COVID-19 virus or vaccines.
So what does this issue really come down to? Trust.
False Prophet (The world’s greatest and ‘most trusted’ social influencer)
Revelation 13:16-17 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
World Economic Forum; ‘CommonPass TRUST Network’
I would argue that, especially now in the age of COVID-19, a natural default position is one of trust in one’s national health policy. Why would you not trust in a recommendation for a treatment that is being encouraged and supported by nearly every sector of government, from both parties, as well as from international health organizations and the mainstream media?
If one assumes that these groups are operating as intended — that is, that they are motivated by concern for public health, or at the very least, that they serve as checks and balances upon each other in the event of possible corruption — then even reports of deaths shortly following vaccination will not shake such a trust. They will be taken in stride as unfortunate but inevitable — albeit seemingly rare — accidents.
But what if the relationships between pharmaceutical companies and the government are so closely entangled that the integrity of the vaccine approval process is compromised? Is it possible that the influence of the pharmaceutical industry is so pervasive as to neutralize what would otherwise be a self-regulating system of checks and balances?
As unlikely as that may sound to some, a close examination of the conflicts of interest present in the COVID-19 vaccine approval process reveal glaring and disturbing problems that should cause us to question the trustworthiness — at the very least — of the process by which these vaccines have been “approved.”
Big Pharma: The fat cat of lobbyists
That the pharmaceutical industry throws around the weight of its massive wealth has been well documented, earning it the nickname “Big Pharma.” As Open Secrets reveals, the pharmaceutical industry is decidedly the top lobbying force in D.C. Big Pharma is so big, in fact, that pharmaceutical companies “spend more on lobbying than any other industry” and “spend twice what oil and gas spends. [They] have more lobbyists on Capitol Hill than all the congressmen and all the senators combined,” as Robert F. Kennedy Jr. explains.
And Big Pharma doesn’t just spend “big money” — it spends it everywhere.
“Captured agencies” set the stage
It is the wide, multi-pronged reach of Big Pharma’s money that deflates the power of what would otherwise serve as checks and balances on health policy. Kennedy Jr. explains, “Pharmaceutical companies [have] not only corrupted our politicians with huge amounts of lobbying money; They [have] captured the agencies that are supposed to protect Americans from public health threats: the CDC, the FDA, the HHS … They had become sock puppets for the industries they were supposed to regulate. Kennedy goes so far as to claim, “The entire political structure today is saturated in pharmaceutical propaganda.”
In fact, even the first steps of our health regulatory process are tainted by the “tentacles” of Big Pharma in an incredible way. As the Federalist reported: “Few people recognize that most of the funding for [pharmaceutical] clinical trials comes from the pharmaceutical industry and that the industry deeply influences their conduct. Nor is it widely known that two-thirds of the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) budget for evaluating prescription drugs comes from the industry it regulates.”
These money ties set the stage for the COVID-19 vaccine approval process, and already raise some troubling questions. But the U.S. government’s efforts, specifically, to bring a COVID-19 vaccine to market as quickly as possible are fraught with yet more disturbing red flags.
Considering that the mRNA mechanism used in these vaccines has never before been deemed safe for public use, the question of the purity of intention behind its promotion is a matter of urgency.
Birth of Operation Warp Speed
The group charged with the selection, funding, and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines and treatments in the U.S. was Operation Warp Speed. It described itself as a public-private partnership that would “coordinate existing HHS-wide efforts” and involve government’s major branches, including the CDC, FDA, NIH, and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA).
While Operation Warp Speed was technically an initiative of the Trump administration, a significant number of the players involved clashed with the White House, as Politico revealed. In fact, White House Coronavirus Task Force members were reported to have been excluded from early Warp Speed discussions.
“We were blindsided by it,” said a former White House official involved in the task force, according to Politico. “They wouldn’t brief the task force on it … [just] a private briefing.”
Politico further reveals that Operation Warp Speed was really the brainchild of Health and Human Services secretary Alex Azar, “who was often at odds with the White House.”
In the lead-up to the birthing of Operation Warp Speed, “HHS officials convened a new advisory board for the secretary featuring the government’s top scientists” — including NIH Director Francis Collins, Anthony Fauci, the CDC’s Nancy Messonnier and others — “that met several times in early April, reviewing the initial development of Covid-19 treatments and vaccines,” reported Politico.
“By Monday April 13, the team had developed a PowerPoint presentation that described their ‘MP2’ [Manhattan Project 2] vision, and Azar met with White House senior adviser Jared Kushner to pitch him on the plan,” Politico continued.
“Kushner was ‘completely supportive’ of the project, Azar told POLITICO, and White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows also threw his support behind the idea.” Azar subsequently began “quietly calling industry contacts to find potential drug-industry executives who could help steer the new initiative.”
Politico goes on to reveal that Azar later called government officials and “made the $3 trillion pitch,” in Azar’s own words.
“We should put everything we have against this. It should be a whole of government approach. We should build a board of directors that involves us. And we can declare a goal of January 1 for a vaccine and move against that,” Azar said of his vaccine plan, explaining that it had won unanimous approval.
What was formerly titled “Manhattan Project 2” became Operation Warp Speed. “HHS officials quickly moved forward on recruiting venture capitalist Moncef Slaoui as Warp Speed’s top scientific adviser and tapping other industry veterans like Carlo de Notaristefani to oversee the project’s manufacturing.”
While the problems with Operation Warp Speed were arguably rooted in Azar’s pharma-friendly strategy, they first materialized in the personnel picks for Warp Speed, beginning at the top.
Warp Speed’s chief scientist, Moncef Slaoui, was the former chairman for vaccines at GlaxoSmithKline, which “coincidentally” received the largest [contract] payout at the start of Operation Warp Speed. He had also, just prior to his appointment, served as a member of the board of directors of Moderna Therapeutics, which came to gain billions of dollars from its head start as maker of the second emergency-authorized COVID-19 vaccine.
Slaoui was criticized for continuing to hold more than $10 million worth of stock options in Moderna even after his Operation Warp Speed appointment, and he eventually sold those shares, to donate the value to cancer research.
However, he continued to hold just under $10 million in GlaxoSmithKline stock, and was reported to have joined Operation Warp Speed on the condition that he would not have to sell it.
“I have worked for 29 years for GSK,” Dr. Slaoui told the New York Times. “I have never sold a single share of any company in my life. This is my retirement. What I said regarding the GSK shares, I said I cannot take the job if I have to sell them.”
“People shouldn’t have to wonder if federal investments are going where they are needed most to develop a successful vaccine or if they are being handed out to boost the personal financial holdings of government contractors or as favors to friends of the Administration,” commented Eli Zupnick, spokesman for Patients Over Pharma.
Playing both sides
Even more troubling is the incredible role twist during Operation Warp Speed for Dr. Peter Marks, one of the single most influential figures during the COVID-19 vaccine rollout.
Marks was appointed to oversee the vaccines component of Operation Warp Speed. As such, he would have played a key role in choosing which vaccines the government selected and funded during Operation Warp Speed, as the recounting of government officials seems to affirm. Politico reported that “according to three people familiar with the event,” Marks’ “reticence was clear at the April 28 meeting of the White House coronavirus task force where Birx laid into Marks about the nation’s vaccine strategy.”
“Birx pressed Marks for clearer answers on which vaccines the government was working on or funding, and why it was not funding or studying others, said a fourth official familiar with the meeting.”
Why was Marks reported to have been “reticent” during this meeting? Perhaps the answer to this question sheds light on some of the current problems with COVID-19 vaccines.
Politico claims, “But the FDA’s vaccine chief does not make those calls. Other scientists, including the chief of the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority [BARDA], dictate key funding decisions.”
But indeed, at the time, Marks’ role was not FDA vaccine chief, but Operation Warp Speed vaccine chief. Operation Warp Speed says it would help coordinate work by BARDA. Are we to imagine that as vaccine chief, Marks had no say in which vaccines were being selected? Why would he be grilled about the questions of which vaccines they were funding?
Politico also revealed that during Operation Warp Speed planning meetings, Marks “argued for a sweeping effort to use the federal government’s powers and deep pockets, and officials openly discussed the idea of a [project] that would rush Covid-19 treatments and vaccines.” While discussing these meetings during an HHS podcast, Marks explained, “Sometimes, there are ways to eliminate dead space … you can eliminate time between things.”
It was in May 2020, shortly after Operation Warp Speed was launched, that Marks returned to his former role as chief regulator of vaccines at the FDA. In his official statement on the decision, released through the FDA press office and shared by Politico, he said, “I believe that the American public will be best served by my return full time to FDA, where I can continue to work collaboratively, with industry, government partners and other researchers and provide regulatory advice to expedite the development and availability of vaccines to combat COVID-19.”
This was a momentous turn of events. The man chosen to help select the vaccines that would be distributed nationwide to combat COVID-19, in an operation that was an openly “public-private partnership” — and who was involved in the push for hurried vaccine development — would now be the one in charge of deciding whether the vaccines were safe enough for public use.
The real kicker is that then-FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn claimed in August that they had “drawn a very bright line at FDA between us and Operation Warp Speed because we’re the independent regulator. We can’t make those decisions about which vaccine to put forward, etc. We can only provide technical assistance.”
“What we can’t be and what we aren’t are the folks who are deciding who gets to develop moving forward. Operation Warp Speed uses federal dollars to actually decide which of the manufacturers of vaccine and therapeutics they’re going to choose to support,” Hahn continued.
Marks has discussed on FDA podcasts his role in helping to approve the COVID-19 vaccines as director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), which is “responsible for assuring the safety and effectiveness” of vaccines, among other products.
In one discussion, he reveals a troubling fact about the COVID-19 vaccine approval process. Because of the rushed deployment of the COVID-19 vaccines, they are skipping a “fourth stage of development” that ordinarily occurs; or rather, implementing it after the vaccine is approved.
“Sometimes it’s called phase four. But in this case, it’s what happens after the vaccine is approved, which is that sometimes we ask manufacturers to do additional work, to look in special populations, or we ask them to do studies, to look at even larger numbers of people to make sure that we really understand how the vaccine works in either specific populations or that we understand any specific side effects that we think might be associated with the vaccine,” said Marks.
“So, we will be making sure that after the vaccine is out there and getting used, any vaccine that we are keeping tabs on what’s happening in terms of its safety, we’ll be making sure that there aren’t some rare adverse events that pops up that we didn’t see before,” Marks continued.
Another red flag for Operation Warp Speed was the appointment of top FDA drug regulator Janet Woodcock to oversee COVID-fighting therapeutics (as opposed to vaccines).
Woodcock, who joined the FDA in 1986, is currently its Acting Commissioner and the director of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), a position she has held since 2008, and before that, held from 1994 to 2004.
Because of her role as head of CDER, which is the FDA department responsible for approving new prescription opioids, she has been blasted for her part in the nation’s devastating opioid crisis. The Guardian reported that no less than 28 groups wrote a letter to the Biden administration in January accusing Woodcock of presiding over “one of the worst regulatory agency failures in US history.”
“In its opioid decision-making, Dr. Woodcock, and the division she supervised, consistently put the interests of opioid manufacturers ahead of public health, often overruling its own scientific advisors and ignoring the pleas of public health groups, state Attorneys General, and outraged victims of the opioid crisis,” the letter said.
“The letter accused Woodcock of ‘dereliction of duty’ for allowing opioid manufacturers to spend years disseminating false claims that narcotic painkillers were less addictive and more effective than they really were, contributing to the rise of mass opioid prescribing and spread of an epidemic that has claimed more than 500,000 (5) lives,” according to the Guardian.
Even more damning were revelations that FDA officials “responsible for opioid approvals were taking part in ‘pay to play’ schemes where manufacturers paid tens of thousands of dollars to attend meetings to draw up the criteria for approving prescription narcotics.”
Dr. Raeford E. Brown, chairman of the FDA opioid advisory committee whose own recommendations have often been overruled, has claimed that there is a “war” within the FDA, and that their “lack of insight” “is in many ways a willful blindness that borders on the criminal.”
Woodcock’s approach to drug regulation also seems to be confirmed by her support of the 21st Century Cures Act, which was criticized as a “huge step backwards for patients” for loosening drug approval standards and allowing pharma companies to bypass randomized trials and even independent FDA analysis of drug studies.
Politico reported that Woodcock “raised strong concerns” during Operation Warp Speed regarding a proposal to track hydroxychloroquine use outside of clinical trials, saying “it would promote off-label prescriptions of hydroxychloroquine without proof the drug was safe or effective for coronavirus patients.”
Considering that hydroxychloroquine has been approved for use without restriction by the FDA for over 65 years, as well as her abysmal track record at the FDA, one wonders whether Dr. Woodcock is driven by commitment to public health, or loyalty to Big Pharma.
Even more causes for alarm in the vaccine approval process are revealed upon a closer look at the first two pharma companies to bring a COVID-19 “vaccine” to market, and gain billions of dollars through their head start: Pfizer and Moderna.
Pharma giant partners with company backed by Gates Foundation
The first company to have a COVID-19 approved for emergency use by a so-called “stringent regulatory authority” — Pfizer — which came in close second to Sanofi/GlaxoSmithKline for the largest contract payouts awarded in Operation Warpspeed — is distinguished among pharma companies for spreading the wealth among public officials.
As OpenSecrets.org reveals, Pfizer was the top pharma contributor by a wide margin to political candidates and parties during the 2020 election cycle, donating a total of $3,279,380. Open Secrets lists a total of 853 recipients of that [largesse], with Joe Biden topping the list as their greatest beneficiary, followed by the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee and the DNC Services Corp. The long list of their beneficiaries also includes Donald Trump, congressional campaign committees of both parties, congressmen, mayors, state party groups, and a variety of PACs.
Might this be why the company is so favored, despite its being among the “convicted serial felons” of pharmaceutical companies?
While it’s not unreasonable to say that Pfizer’s lavish spending laid the “groundwork for its November 20 filing for Emergency Use Authorization for its coronavirus vaccine” (Chander, 2020; Children’s Health Defense, 2020), as The Children’s Health Defense noted, Pfizer had another advantage in the race to market.
Pfizer had already partnered with BioNTech to develop mRNA-based vaccines for influenza in August 2018, and in September 2019, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation invested $55 (5) million in BioNTech to develop HIV and tuberculosis programs. The foundation praised BioNTech for its “innovative mRNA-based approach.”
This primed BioNTech to get a head start developing an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine at “lightspeed” in mid-January of 2020, just days after the virus’s genetic sequences were released.
What is noteworthy here is that the development of an mRNA-based flu vaccine never passed the preclinical trial phase — nor have most of BioNTech’s mRNA-based treatments, as one observes in the “product pipeline” section of the BioNTech website. In fact, aside from their COVID-19 mRNA “vaccine,” only one other mRNA treatment has passed Phase 1 of clinical trials. This is after a few years of having research results on mrNA mechanisms published by BioNTech, which was founded in 2008.
Since the Pfizer mRNA vaccine has been authorized for public use, numerous deaths have been reported to have occurred shortly following vaccination. One German whistleblower, for example, reported that seven of 31 nursing home residents with dementia died shortly after their Pfizer vaccination.
Uncanny timing for NIH fortune
There is another enormous conflict of interest that raises questions about the approval of the second mRNA COVID-19 vaccine to come to market, developed by Moderna. In fact, the Moderna vaccine was being prepared by a government-pharma partnership even before COVID-19 was sequenced.
“According to Public Citizen, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) owns a 50% (5)stake in Moderna’s mRNA-1273 vaccine, which it helped develop under the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), run by Dr. Anthony Fauci,” reported CHD.
Axios reported that “NIH and Moderna have researched coronaviruses, like MERS, for several years,” and that they signed a contract in December 2019 “that stated ‘mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates [are] developed and jointly owned’ by the two parties. The contract was not specific to the novel coronavirus, and it was signed before the new virus had been sequenced.
The first signature of the agreement is dated December 12, 2019, which was only four days before the first documented hospital admission due to COVID-19, and weeks before the virus outbreak was publicized.
NIH Director Francis Collins confirmed during an Economic Club interview in May, “We do have some particular stake in the intellectual property” behind Moderna’s coronavirus vaccine.
“Little known NIH regulations let agency scientists collect up to $150,000.00 (5+5+5) annually in royalties from vaccines upon which they worked,” CHD reported. “These rules are recipes for regulatory corruption.”
What Moderna has in common with BioNTech is that it has failed to prove the safety and efficacy of its mRNA candidates during the whole span of its work with mRNA treatments.
As of May 2020, only one of its mRNA candidates had passed Phase 1 trials, and not one had been brought to market since 2013, when it signed an agreement with AstraZeneca to develop and commercialize mRNA therapeutic treatments.
StatNews noted in 2016 that mRNA-based treatments are “highly risky,” and that “[b]ig pharma companies had tried similar work and abandoned it because it’s exceedingly hard to get RNA into cells without triggering nasty side effects.”
“Novartis abandoned the related realm of RNA interference over concerns about toxicity, as did Merck and Roche,” StatNews continued.
These difficulties with mRNA treatments, as well as NIH’s stake in Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine and the rush to bring COVID-19 treatments to market, may explain why Fauci has allowed Moderna to skip animal trials, allowing the vaccine process that typically “can take 15 to 20 years, start to finish,” to be compressed into mere months, Mark Feinberg, president and CEO of the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative, told Stat News in March 2020.
CHD has since reported on discrepancies in Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine trial, saying that while Moderna had claimed a 94.5 percent efficacy rate, when additional cases of COVID-19 occurring between the first and second shot were accounted for, the efficacy rate was shown to be 75.4 percent.
In addition to the evidence, as well as VAERS reports of numerous deaths shortly following the Moderna vaccine, The Defender reported that California was forced to recall a batch of 330,000 Moderna vaccines after a cascade of reported injuries, though now the company says it’s okay to resume administration of that batch.
With all these things considered, the question is: Can a COVID-19 vaccine approval process marked by such egregious and numerous conflicts of interest refrain from compromising public health and safety?
‘Do you STILL want to receive an experimental vaccine even if it is NOT YET administered in your hand or forehead with a ‘vaccine micro-needle smart patch’?’
The ‘mark’ comes shortly, during the tribulation, but the Bride is ‘not here.’ The ‘current’ vaccine(s) are NOT the mark, yet. But they are a ‘precursor’ of the beast system process, getting people accustomed to getting ‘tagged’, ‘marked’ or ‘branded.’
3 Reasons Christians Should Stop Worrying about the Mark of the Beast. Two Watchman Confirm a Matter.
Clarence L. Haynes Jr. 2021 3 Feb
There seems to be a lot of worry, grave concern, and fascination over the mark of the beast, especially among Christians. This fascination over the mark has only grown with the Covid crisis and the introduction of vaccines. Many people are trying to tie the mark of the beast to the vaccines, fearful that if they take the vaccine they are taking the mark. Some are even worried they may be tricked into taking the mark without knowing it.
Today I want to put your mind at ease because none of this is true. In fact, if you are a true follower of Christ, I want to tell you to stop worrying right now. I will even take it a step further and tell you that you are concerned about something that you really don’t need to be the least bit concerned about. You can literally put any fear you have about the mark of the beast completely to rest.
I am going to give you three important reasons why you can do this and do it confidently. Regardless of what you have heard or were taught before, we are going to let the truth of God’s word speak for itself. You do not need to be a Bible scholar, nor do you need to be an expert in Bible prophecy to comprehend this topic in Scripture. A simple reading and understanding of the Bible is all that is required to put your mind at ease, so let’s do just that.
Reason 1 – Those Who Take the Mark Are Worshippers of the Beast
Look at these verses in Revelation 13:
“One of the heads of the beast seemed to have had a fatal wound, but the fatal wound had been healed. The whole world was filled with wonder and followed the beast. People worshiped the dragon because he had given authority to the beast, and they also worshiped the beast and asked, ‘Who is like the beast? Who can wage war against it?’ (Revelation 13:3-4).
As you read this, I don’t want you to get too bogged down in trying to figure out or interpret the symbolisms or the meaning of these prophetic words. That is a conversation for another day. To keep this as simple as possible, the dragon represents Satan and this beast represents the Antichrist. However, that is not where I want you to focus your attention. I want you to pay close attention to the reaction of the world to the beast and the dragon. There are three things clearly mentioned.
They were filled with wonder concerning the beast.
This wonder led them to follow the beast.
Following the beast led to them to worship the dragon and the beast.
Why are these three things so critical? These things matter because this is a precursor and an indicator of the people who will ultimately take the mark of the beast. Those who will take this mark are those who have chosen to follow and worship the dragon and the beast. Another way of looking at it is they have pledged their allegiance to the beast. It is this pledge of allegiance that will ultimately lead them to take this mark.
The taking of the mark is an outward reflection of a decision these people have made in their hearts. Taking the mark follows a very natural progression because they have already decided to follow the beast. I want to make this abundantly clear: You cannot be tricked or duped into taking the mark of the beast, you must make a conscious decision to do it. In other words, there are no “gotchas” when it comes to the mark of the beast. No one can pull the wool over your eyes. In order to take this mark your heart and your will must be fully engaged in the process.
Reason 2 – Those Who Worship the Beast Are Not in the Lamb’s Book of Life
“All inhabitants of the earth will worship the beast—all whose names have not been written in the Lamb’s book of life, the Lamb who was slain from the creation of the world” (Revelation 13:8).
May I ask you, is your name written in the Lamb’s book of life? You might be wondering how you can know for sure. Well here is the answer:
“Yet to all who did receive him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God” (John 1:12).
“For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life” (John 3:16).
If you have met the very simple criteria laid out here in Scripture, your name is written in the Lamb’s book of life. If Jesus truly is your Savior, then your name is written in that book. If you truly belong to Christ, there is no way you would ever pledge your allegiance or your worship to anyone else. Aside from that, and probably more importantly, is that if you belong to Christ, he will keep you.
“My sheep listen to my voice; I know them, and they follow me. I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; no one will snatch them out of my hand. My Father, who has given them to me, is greater than all; no one can snatch them out of my Father’s hand” (John 10:27-29).
“To him who is able to keep you from stumbling and to present you before his glorious presence without fault and with great joy—to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen” (Jude 1:24-25).
I implore you today to stop worrying about some mark and start putting your focus on the one who has promised to keep you and present you faultless in his presence. This is where your attention should be. When the truth of Scripture takes hold of your heart, any fear or concern about a mark should go away. Jesus has got you and he will not let you go.
Reason 3 – You Are Probably Not Going to Be Here Anyway
When you study Bible prophecy, the period of time when this issue of the mark of the beast arises is called The Great Tribulation. Many Bible scholars believe that this period will take place after an event called the rapture of the church. If you are not familiar, this is when Christ comes and all who belong to him, whose names are in the Lamb’s book of life, are caught up to be with him thus ushering in this period of time known as The Great Tribulation. Look at these verses:
“For the Lord himself will come down from heaven, with a loud command, with the voice of the archangel and with the trumpet call of God, and the dead in Christ will rise first. After that, we who are still alive and are left will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. And so we will be with the Lord forever” (1 Thessalonians 4:16-17).
Let’s apply some simple reasoning here.
Let’s assume the rapture happens before the tribulation (I believe it does).
We know the mark of the beast is only going to be relevant to those who are in the tribulation (The Bible is clear about this).
If both of these things are true, then you are not going to be here during this period of time. To make it plain and clear, you have nothing to worry about. The only time in history the mark of the beast becomes relevant is during this tribulation period. Since this period happens after the rapture of the church, it means right now we are not in that period.
By the way, let’s say I am wrong and the rapture happens some time during the tribulation as some believe. Then you can still lean back on the promise of John and Jude that we mentioned earlier. Regardless of what happens, if you are in Christ, you are safe. So stop worrying about the mark of the beast.
Final Thought – Always Fall Back on Truth
Jesus said in John 8:32, you shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free. Many times, the fears, anxieties, and worries we have come because we are not aware of the truth. This applies to the mark of the beast or anything else that can cause you great concern.
Whenever you are faced with something that seems scary or worrisome in nature, please fall back on the truth of God’s word. Let your comfort and your source of information be God’s word and nothing else. If you will do this then even in times where people are running around with great anxiety, you will not be one of them. You will know the truth and that will set you free.
Seven (7) References to ‘BE WATCHING or WATCHFUL.’
Matthew 24:42; Watch therefore: for ye know not what hour your Lord doth come.
Matthew 25:13; Watch therefore, for ye know neither the day nor the hour wherein the Son of man cometh.
Mark 13:35; Watch ye therefore: for ye know not when the master of the house cometh, at even, or at midnight, or at the cockcrowing, or in the morning.
Luke 21:36; Watch ye therefore, and pray always, that ye may be accounted worthy to escape all these things that shall come to pass, and to stand before the Son of man
Luke 12:37-39; Blessed are those servants, whom the lord when he cometh shall find watching: verily I say unto you, that he shall gird himself, and make them to sit down to meat, and will come forth and serve them. And if he shall come in the second watch, or come in the third watch, and find them so, blessed are those servants. And this know, that if the goodman of the house had known what hour the thief would come, he would have watched, and not have suffered his house to be broken through.
1 Thessalonians 5:2-4; For yourselves know perfectly that the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night. For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape. But ye, brethren, are not in darkness, that that day should overtake you as a thief. (Be Watching).
John 13:19 Now I tell you before it come, that, when it is come to pass, ye may believe that I am he.
John 14:29 And now I have told you before it come to pass, that, when it is come to pass, ye might believe.
Luke 21:31 So likewise ye, when ye see these things come to pass, know ye that the kingdom of God is nigh at hand.
Mark 13:29 So ye in like manner, when ye shall see these things come to pass, know that it is nigh, even at the doors.
Luke 21:28 And when these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads; for your redemption draweth nigh.
Revelation 1:1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified it by his angel unto his servant John:
‘Increasing Like Labor Pains.’ ‘Fearful Sights.’ ‘Perilous Times.’ ‘Men’s hearts failing with fear.’ Great Convergence of Signs.’ REDEMPTION IMMINENT.
In His Service,
Night Watchman Ministries
Make Your Decision for Christ NOW!!!!!!! Time is Up!!!!!!!
Jesus Christ’s Offer of Salvation:
The ABCs of Salvation through Jesus Christ (the Lamb)
A. Admit/Acknowledge/Accept that you are sinner. Ask God’s forgiveness and repent of your sins.
. . . “For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God.” (Romans 3:23).
. . . “As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one.” (Romans 3:10).
. . . “If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.” (1 John 1:8).
B. Believe Jesus is Lord. Believe that Jesus Christ is who He claimed to be; that He was both fully God and fully man and that we are saved through His death, burial, and resurrection. Put your trust in Him as your only hope of salvation. Become a son or daughter of God by receiving Christ.
. . . “That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life. For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God sent not his son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. (John 3:15-17). For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.” (Romans 10:13).
C. Call upon His name, Confess with your heart and with your lips that Jesus is your Lord and Savior.
. . . “That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.” (Romans 10:9-10).
. . . “If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us.” (John 1:8-10).
. . . “And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world. (John 2:2).
. . . “In this was manifested the love of god toward us, because that God sent his only begotten Son into the world, that we might live through him. And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Saviour of the world. Whosoever shall confess that Jesus is the Son of God, God dwelleth in him, and he in God.” (1 John 4:9, 14-15).
. . . “But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us. Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through him. For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life.” (Romans 5:8-10).
. . . “For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.” (Romans 6:23).
. . . “Jesus saith unto them, I am the way, the truth, and the life, no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.” (John 14:6).
. . . “For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to everyone that believeth.” (Romans 1:16).
. . . “Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.” (Acts: 4:12).
. . . “Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth for there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus.” (1 Timothy 2:4-6).
. . . “For God did not appoint us to suffer wrath but to receive salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ.” (1 Thessalonians 5:9).
. . . “But as many as received him, to them gave the power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name.” (John 1:12).
True Church / Bride of Christ Spared from God’s Wrath:
Romans 5:8-10. “But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us. Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through him. For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life.”
Romans 12:19. Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
1 Thessalonians 1:10. And to wait for his Son from heaven, whom he raised from the dead, even Jesus, which delivered us from the wrath to come.
1 Thessalonians 5:9. For God hath not appointed us to wrath, but to obtain salvation by our Lord Jesus Christ,
Romans 8:35. Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword?
Jeremiah 30:7. Alas! for that day is great, so that none is like it: it is even the time of Jacob’s trouble, but he shall be saved out of it.
Revelation 3:10 Because thou hast kept the word of my patience, I also will keep thee from the hour of temptation, which shall come upon all the world, to try them that dwell upon the earth.